Comparative Research on Rule‑Based (Traditional) Chatbots vs. AI‑Driven Conversational Assistants

1. Definitions and evolution of chatbots
   Rule‑based/chatbots with limited knowledge – sometimes called menu‑based or decision‑tree bots – follow predefined rules to offer preset answers. They are cheap to build and deliver consistent answers but lack flexibility and cannot handle ambiguous or unexpected inputs. They have been useful for repetitive queries like FAQs, lead qualification or simple transactions[1]. However, user satisfaction drops when questions fall outside the scripted paths, causing dead‑ends and frustration[1].
   AI‑powered chatbots/conversational assistants use machine learning, natural‑language processing (NLP) and deep learning to understand user intent, maintain context and generate dynamic responses. They can learn from interactions and personalise replies, handle more complex queries, proactively engage users and integrate with CRM systems[2]. AI assistants require larger budgets and training data but offer scalability and better customer experience.
2. Adoption and usage statistics
3. Performance of rule‑based chatbots
   3.1 Satisfaction and accuracy
   A study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (Oct 2024) evaluated a rule‑based customer‑service bot and a hybrid bot combining rule‑based logic with AI enhancements. Key findings include:

The researchers concluded that rule‑based bots are appropriate for predictable scenarios but struggle with context and scale; hybrid or AI‑powered models significantly improve satisfaction and accuracy[8]. Surveys also found that user dissatisfaction grows (45 %) when rule‑based bots are used for complex tasks[8].
3.2 Market perceptions and limitations of legacy chatbots
Consumer sentiment: A 2024 CivicScience survey showed that 45 % of U.S. adults viewed customer‑service chatbots unfavourably, while only 19 % saw them favourably[13]. Only 17 % of people used chatbots for customer service and most preferred phone calls or email[14]. Among those who had used chatbots, 44 % considered them at least somewhat helpful, but 24 % still found them not helpful[15]. These attitudes reflect experiences with earlier, rule‑based systems.
Business outcomes: According to the LiveChatAI blog, a rule‑based bot in a retail case study was able to handle over 70 % of customer inquiries without human intervention[16]. Research Nester found that 60 % of B2B and 42 % of B2C companies still use rule‑based chatbots[5] because they are inexpensive and easy to implement, yet their limitations often produce frustration and dead‑ends[1].
Issues with poor experiences: Omnisend’s 2025 shopper survey reported that only 28 % of consumers feel AI chatbots consistently understand their needs; 39 % have abandoned purchases due to frustrating chatbot interactions and 48 % wanted better customer service[17]. Adam Connell’s research noted that 65 % of people would leave a business after a negative chatbot experience[18].
These data show that basic chatbots (rule‑based or poorly designed AI) can hurt sales and customer satisfaction. Slow response, limited logic and inability to process orders lead to customer frustration and abandoned shopping carts.

4. Performance of AI‑powered conversational assistants
   4.1 Satisfaction and resolution statistics

4.2 Benefits and challenges highlighted by researchers
Faster responses and productivity: Nextiva’s data show live‑chat responses average two minutes, compared with ten hours for social media and twelve hours for email[21]. AI chatbots can work around the clock, handle multiple chats simultaneously and deliver answers three times faster than traditional support[3]. This drives higher customer satisfaction and frees human agents for complex tasks.
Cost and efficiency: AI chatbots can automate up to 30 % of tasks currently performed by contact‑center staff and 80 % of routine tasks[3], potentially saving U.S. businesses $23 billion[3]. Comm100 found they reduce customer service costs by 30–50 %[25].
Sales and engagement: Business leaders report a 67 % increase in sales through chatbots and digital assistants, with up to 70 % conversion rates in certain industries[7]. They are frequently used for sales (41 % of deployments) and client services (37 %)[3].
Customer trust and limitations: Despite improvements, AI chatbots still face mistrust. A 2025 Prosper Insights survey cited by Gartner found that 34 % of Gen X, half of baby boomers and about one‑quarter of Gen Z and millennials do not trust AI to protect their interests; 64 % of consumers would rather companies not use AI for customer service and 60 % worry AI makes it harder to reach a human[26]. Experts stress the need for easy escalation paths and hybrid models[20].

5. Connections, trends and conclusions
   User satisfaction depends on task complexity. Rule‑based chatbots deliver high satisfaction (87 %) and accuracy for simple, well‑structured queries[8], but satisfaction plummets to 55 % on complex tasks and accuracy drops to 68 %[8]. Hybrid or AI‑powered bots improve satisfaction dramatically to 80 % for complex queries and raise accuracy to 85 %[8].
   AI chatbots offer better overall experience but still have weaknesses. The IJCSRR study found that users rate AI chatbots 4.3/5 on response time and 4.0/5 overall satisfaction[12]. Resolution rates (82 % in e‑commerce) are high, yet misinterpretations and lack of emotional intelligence lead to negative sentiments for 15 % of users[20]. Complex sectors such as healthcare see lower resolution (68 %) and more escalations (32 %), emphasising the need for human backup[19].
   Consumer attitudes toward chatbots are evolving. Surveys in 2024 showed widespread scepticism: only 19 % of U.S. adults had a favourable view of chatbots and many preferred telephone or email[27]. By 2025, 62 % of consumers preferred interacting with chatbots over waiting for a human agent[22] and 87.2 % rated their interactions as neutral or positive[3]. This shift likely reflects improvements in conversational AI and increased familiarity.
   Business benefits drive adoption. Companies adopt chatbots for cost savings and operational efficiency. AI chatbots can automate 30 % of contact‑centre tasks and 80 % of routine tasks, saving billions of dollars[3]. They also improve sales – 67 % of leaders report increased sales and 26 % of transactions begin with a bot[7]. Consequently, 34 % of firms intend to increase their use of AI chatbots[6].
   Hybrid models appear to be the future. Both the 2024 IJIRT review and the 2025 IJCSRR study highlight the need for hybrid approaches that combine chatbots and human agents. Hybrid bots achieved a 95 % success rate handling both simple and complex queries[8]. Experts recommend easy hand‑off to human agents and sentiment detection to prevent frustration[20]. Gartner predicts that 20–30 % of service agents may be replaced with generative AI by 2026[28], but human oversight will remain essential in complex or emotional scenarios.
   Trust and ethical concerns remain. Many consumers still worry about privacy and AI biases; 64 % would prefer businesses not to use AI for customer service[26]. A balanced approach that enhances transparency and allows users to opt for human support is crucial.
6. Summary
   The evolution from rule‑based chatbots to AI‑powered conversational assistants has improved customer satisfaction and resolution rates, particularly for complex queries. Rule‑based bots are quick and reliable for simple tasks but deliver only 55 % satisfaction on complex issues[8]. AI or hybrid bots raise satisfaction to around 80 % and can resolve about 82 % of e‑commerce queries without human help[19]. Adoption is rising because chatbots reduce response times, cut costs and boost sales[3], but user trust, emotional intelligence and transparency remain challenges. Future strategies should therefore focus on hybrid models, sentiment detection, industry‑specific training and ethical AI design to maximise the benefits of conversational assistants while maintaining human‑centric customer care.

[1] [2] [5] [6] [16] Rule-Based Chatbots vs. AI Chatbots: Differences & Comparison
https://livechatai.com/blog/rule-based-chatbots-vs-ai-chatbots
[3] [4] [7] BEST Chatbot Statistics [2025 Updated]
https://masterofcode.com/blog/chatbot-statistics
[8] [9] [10] [11] Paper Title (use style: paper title)
https://ijirt.org/publishedpaper/IJIRT168361_PAPER.pdf
[12] [19] [20] [25] 17-1203-2025.pdf
https://ijcsrr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/17-1203-2025.pdf
[13] [14] [15] [27] Customer Service Chatbots: People Prefer Human Conversations
https://civicscience.com/customer-service-chatbots-earn-mixed-reviews-as-people-still-prefer-human-conversations/
[17] Are Retailers Losing Sales to Automation? 39% of Shoppers Have Abandoned Their Purchase Due to Frustrating AI Chatbots – Omnisend
https://www.omnisend.com/latest-news/are-retailers-losing-sales-to-automation-39-of-shoppers-have-abandoned-their-purchase-due-to-frustrating-ai-chatbots/
[18] 50 Critical Chatbot Statistics You Need To Know In 2025
https://adamconnell.me/chatbot-statistics/
[21] 25 Live Chat Statistics and Trends for 2025
https://www.nextiva.com/blog/live-chat-statistics.html
[22] 5+ Types of Chatbots: From Rule-Based to AI
https://masterofcode.com/blog/types-of-chatbots
[23] How to Sell More and Faster: 5 Ways to Use AI for Responding to Customer Inquiries
https://dlabs.ai/blog/how-to-use-ai-for-responding-to-customer-inquiries/
[24] 34 Key Live Chat Statistics Every Business Should Know in 2025
https://digitalmindsbpo.com/blog/live-chat-statistics/
[26] [28] Customer service trends 2025: AI hype vs. customer trust
https://www.the-future-of-commerce.com/2024/12/09/customer-service-trends-2025/